Click Image to Enlarge

One factor that affects measurement accuracy on a presetter is the location accuracy of the adapters that accommodate different toolholder types. The presetter shown here holds and locates adapters using a locking mechanism that provides for this accuracy. The operator is inserting an adapter for holding 40-taper toolholders.
Every machine shop has a tool measurement device, says Richard
McCarthy. In some shops, the tool measurement device is the machining
center itself. That can be an expensive way to go.
Mr. McCarthy is a national sales manager for tool measurement systems with Big Kaiser Precision Tooling
(Elk Grove Village, Illinois). The tool measurement devices he helps
shops to implement are commonly known as “presetters.” The term may be
somewhat misleading, because shops using these devices enjoy a range of
benefits even if they don’t literally “preset” their tools. Typically,
the most significant of these benefits is saving time at the machining
center. As an alternative to using feeler gages and test cuts to
determine tool offsets at the machine, using a presetter to perform
independent tool measurement away from the machine can free up
considerable productive time.
Who Needs A Presetter
Mr. McCarthy says job shops often assume they aren’t good candidates
for presetters because their production quantities are small. In fact,
job shops often represent the very best applications for presetters. A
process that might not need a presetter is one that runs the same part
all day long, day after day. A process like this requires tools to be
changed out only because of wear. By contrast, job shops change tooling
not only because of wear, but also because of new jobs. The more
frequently a shop has to load a fresh tool in a machining center, the
more savings off-line tool measurement can deliver.
However, even facilities with long stretches of time between tool
replacements might benefit from off-line measurement. An additional
advantage relates to the impact of runout on tool life and
productivity. By using a presetter to set up its tools, a shop can
detect runout problems and hold each tool to a defined runout limit.
Without this kind of control, machining with too much runout
accelerates tool wear by forcing one edge to perform the brunt of the
cutting. A shop that doesn’t recognize this problem may run slowly or
take shallow cuts just to preserve the life of the tool. By identifying
and curing the problem, the shop can realize more aggressive material
removal.
Controlling runout is particularly important for
small-diameter tools because the acceptable runout for any tool is
proportional to its size. According to Mr. McCarthy, this is the reason
why one high-volume manufacturer implemented presetting. While time
lost at the machining center was not a concern, the shop believed tool
runout might be a significant problem for its small-diameter tools.
After discovering runout error resulting from the toolholders, the shop
switched to holders that permitted faster production. Without using the
presetter to perform this diagnosis, the shop may never have considered
this fix.
Prerequisites
Shops implementing presetters often learn lessons like this because the
presetter forces a more disciplined approach to measuring tools. In
fact, it also tends to force a more disciplined approach to tool
management. Tooling stored in toolboxes and bins throughout the shop
needs to be gathered together in a central location close to the
presetter. Getting all the tooling in one place may save the shop
considerable time in its own right because operators no longer have to
roam the shop in search of tools.
This
centralization is just one of the requirements for successful off-line
tool measurement, Mr. McCarthy says. Another requirement is an
investment in having a sufficient number of tools and holders on-hand.
If the shop is no longer doing tool measurement at the machining
center, then it should have enough extra tooling to run production
while the presetter measures the tools that will be needed next.
Which Presetter Is Right
Various presetters are available across a range of performance levels.
Big Kaiser
offers contact and noncontact models from Diaset and Speroni,
respectively. The contact measurement involves an indicator, while the
noncontact measurement is optical and might be performed either
manually or through CNC.
The contact presetters are the least expensive. The noncontact
models tend to be both more accurate and more efficient. Mr. McCarthy
points out that optical models are upgradeable, so it’s usually not
necessary to begin with an aggressive menu of capabilities. “About the
only thing we can’t expand is the iron,” he says—meaning the
presetter’s size should be carefully chosen to match the largest tool
the shop is likely to need to measure in the future.
The
other fundamental consideration is accuracy. If the shop accepts the
rule that gages should have 10 times better accuracy than the part
tolerance, then this rule can suggest the required accuracy of the
presetter. For example, if parts are to be machined to accuracies as
loose as ±0.005 inch, then tools can be inspected to ±0.0005-inch
accuracy using a contact presetter, Mr. McCarthy says. At ±0.002-inch
part tolerances or tighter, an optical system is necessary to achieve
the corresponding accuracy of tool measurement.
Getting The Data To The Machine
No matter how precise the measurement, there is still the challenge of
getting the tool measurement data to the machine—a step that offers
plenty of opportunity for error. Some presetters offer a label printer
to avoid human error in writing numbers down. The correct measurements
are printed out and affixed to the toolholder. Even then, there is the
“fat finger” problem, which occurs when data from the label is miskeyed
into the control, Mr. McCarthy says. To avoid this error, some
presetters compose NC programs for assigning correct tool offsets. The
machine tool’s CNC runs this program before running the machining
cycle. The operator simply has to load the tools into the correct
pockets.
To
avoid the potential for error even in this tool loading, a still more
aggressive approach is the use of tool ID tags capable of storing
electronic data at each toolholder. With a system such as this, the
presetter can write tool offsets to each tool-and-toolholder assembly.
The CNC using a reader for these tags can identify the tool
automatically, read its offsets, and cycle the tool magazine around to
the right pocket for loading.
Qualified Tools
One final way some shops try to avoid errors in communicating tool data
is by keeping the tool offsets always fixed. They use “qualified”
tools. That is, they use tools that literally are “preset,” because the
user employs the tool measurement system to help him adjust the tool’s
length within the toolholder until it matches a certain predetermined
value. (Only in a case such as this is the measurement device truly
used as a “presetter.”)
A
few types of machines demand these qualified tools because they have no
freedom to apply offsets. These machines include transfer lines,
twin-spindle machines that use identical tools in parallel processes,
and five-axis machines with CNCs that lack the capability to adapt
complex tool paths for tool offset changes. Boring tools also have to
be preset to specific dimensions. Apart from these applications, most
users of presetters employ the device to measure the tool as it is.
However,
the potential to take this opposite approach—determining the offset
first and setting the tool to match—illustrates the increased range of
options the shop has available with a presetter. The need to transfer
data to the CNC can be rendered unnecessary as the shop applies the
presetter to standardize the tool dimensions and achieve even greater
control over the management of its tools.