|
| Home |
Article Archive |
Latest Issue |
Talk To Us |
Previous Page (or Use Back Button) | | Online Tools & Calculators | MMS E-mail Newsletter | |
|
MMS inMotion Multimedia Presentation - Innovative Fixturing Real-World Case Study - Power Steering Gear Housing (Part II) - Transcript(Select the link below to access the entire presentation.)
This is the same power steer gear housing used in; it's a second operation fixture, again it's a two-position fixture. We're using the Continuous Pressure Hydraulics again. We've got part seated detection; that it is different from part presence sensing. We have part presence sensing on this fixture as well, again because of the robot, but on both of these fixtures we've also used an error detect system through our CPH that we call part seated detection. And it is simply as what it states. We wanna make sure that the part is seated down completely against the locators prior to machining the part. If we get an introduction of a chip on top of a locator that the part then is clamped on top of that chip, that chip may be thick enough to influence the second operation cuts such that we would make a bad part. So with the part seated detection we're able to determine whether we, whether the part is completely seated on the locators prior to sending it into the work zone. Again, the goal is trying to reduce down time, reduce scrap, maximize the utilization of the machine as automatic as we can. Both these two fixtures again also use the coolant through the fixture, through the CPH, like Tim mentioned. When the robot unloads the fixture we flush the tops of the rust pads with a coolant wash while the robot is taking the parts out of the fixture and we continuously flush the fixture until the robot brings the next two parts into position for clamping. |
|||||||||||
| |||||||||||