Blog
 

Stephanie Hendrixson

Stephanie (Monsanty) Hendrixson served as a Modern Machine Shop summer intern in 2012 and joined the team as an assistant editor later that fall. She currently works on event news for MMS Online and on the production of the print magazine. She also blogs about additive technology and helps to manage Additive Manufacturing magazine as its associate editor. Stephanie holds an M.A. in professional writing from the University of Cincinnati and a B.A. in English literature and history from the University of Mount Union.

Posted by: Stephanie Hendrixson 14. April 2016

Video: Does Metal Additive Manufacturing Compete with Machining?

Is there a conflict between additive manufacturing and CNC machining? Robert Chiari, a regional sales manager with Renishaw, says no—in fact, it’s quite the opposite. He points out that many manufacturers use both subtractive and additive processes to arrive at a finished part. In the video above, Mr. Chiari discusses the complementary technologies in a conversation with Senior Editor Peter Zelinski.

(This video is one of a series of interviews filmed during the most recent Additive Manufacturing Conference. View the complete list of videos on the Additive Manufacturing website.) 

Posted by: Stephanie Hendrixson 31. March 2016

Freedom in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing

Sciaky’s EBAM system is equipped with two wire feeders that travel with the electron beam head, enabling the building of large parts.  

Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing (EBAM) holds plenty of possibilities for metal AM applications. The process builds parts using an electron beam to melt metal wire that travels with the beam head. In contrast to powder bed systems in which the size of the part is limited by the size of the bed, parts built on an EBAM system can be as large as the machine’s travels permit.

This capacity for building large parts plus its speed gives EBAM clear potential as an alternative to forging. Like forging, it is a near-net-shape process capable of building large forms. But unlike forging, it requires no die or other tooling, making it faster and more flexible. EBAM can provide design freedoms in geometry that forging cannot.

But perhaps more significantly, EBAM also provides material freedom. Chicago-based Sciaky has developed an EBAM system that allows for two different wires to be fed into the machine. This dual-fed system could be used to deposit two spools of wire simultaneously, increasing throughput, or loaded with both large-diameter and fine wire to provide a range of detail. However, its greatest potential may lie in the ability to blend wires of two different alloys within the same build, creating a proprietary alloy or even a gradient between materials. 

Read more about the possibilities of EBAM and how Lockheed Martin is building propellant tank components with this technology on Additive Manufacturing magazine’s website. 

Posted by: Stephanie Hendrixson 24. March 2016

Will Additive Manufacturing Subtract from Machining?

Will additive manufacturing (AM) overtake machining and traditional processes? This was one of the questions posed during an AM panel discussion hosted by Mazak and moderated by Senior Editor Peter Zelinski.

Panelists said that the use of AM will grow as engineers begin to design for the technology, but for now tolerances prevent additive from taking the place of machining. The video above contains the entire 5-minute segment of the discussion.

Panelists (from left to right) are:

Posted by: Stephanie Hendrixson 17. March 2016

How Renishaw Is Lowering Barriers to Additive Manufacturing

Users at the Solutions Centers will get support for their projects from Renishaw applications engineers. Images courtesy of Renishaw.

The barriers to using additive manufacturing (AM) technology for production are physical—having the right equipment, software, etc.—but also largely mental. Engineering a part for additive manufacturing requires a different way of thinking about strength, material usage, finishing and more, especially for users and companies coming from a machining background. Using AM for production also demands confidence in the process, and that it will be repeatable and consistent.

As a way of helping new and potential additive users overcome these hurdles and learn to think with an “AM mindset,” Renishaw has launched its Solutions Center concept. Unveiled at EMO last year, the concept is a global network of facilities intended to help potential and current additive manufacturing users learn about the technology. Users can work within an “incubator cell” staffed with an operator and applications engineer to securely benchmark designs and test out processes. The goal is to help users develop a complete process for manufacturing production parts.

The first Solutions Center in Pune, India, is already open for business and is said to be India’s largest additive manufacturing facility. Additional centers are currently under construction in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Germany.

Read more about the goals and progress of the Solutions Center network on Additive Manufacturing magazine’s website.  

Posted by: Stephanie Hendrixson 25. February 2016

Additive Manufacturing Training Center Opens in Louisville

A new facility dedicated to additive manufacturing training has opened in Louisville, Kentucky. Located on the University of Louisville (UofL) campus, the UL Additive Manufacturing Competency Center (AMCC) is the result of a partnership between the university and Underwriters Laboratories (UL), the safety science organization. An open house with ribbon cutting February 16 commemorated the opening of the center, which began offering courses late last year.

The UL AMCC is set up to illustrate the entire metal additive manufacturing process. It boasts a computer lab for designing and programming AM parts; two selective laser melting machines stocked with stainless steel powder; and a selection of postprocessing, finishing and inspection equipment. The center’s students learn about production, best practices and safety procedures through hands-on interaction with these machines.

Most of the students who come through the UL AMCC work for manufacturers who already own AM equipment, but no prior experience is necessary. Courses are available in three different tiers. Tier 1 provides foundational classes in the basics of 3D printing and additive manufacturing, and is a good starting place for beginners or those who are just thinking about an equipment purchase. Tier 2 includes training in AM design, safety, materials and processes, and Tier 3 offers advanced training in metal part production. A formal certification process developed by UL is available to students who demonstrate required competencies.

The UL AMCC plans to add courses and sections in the future and will update its curriculum every six to 12 months as technologies evolve. View our coverage on the Additive Manufacturing website to learn more about this facility and see photos from the grand opening. 

« Prev | | Next »

We are inspired & innovative. IMTS is where solutions are found & professional goals are fulfilled. Register today!

Subscribe to these Related
RSS Blog Feeds

MMS ONLINE
Channel Partners

Techspex