Confirming Dimensional Accuracy of a Precision Ball
A single diameter isn’t the only measurement parameter that can be used to ensure accuracy.
Regardless of whether a ball is used in an assembly, as a tool or as a master for inspection purposes, it is first necessary to confirm its dimensional accuracy. As with most dimensional standards, the accuracy of a precision ball should be roughly 10 times greater than the resolution of the gage it is used to master, and the instrument used to measure the ball should be 10 times as accurate as they are. Consequently, a precision ball is commonly measured to microinches, or even fractions of microinches.
Creating a Precise Measurement Setup
Comparator gages used to measure balls must not only measure in millionths, they must also measure to millionths and meet the highest standards of stability and precision. This means the gage must be robust with oversized gage members that can be locked together to ensure extreme rigidity. Since the ball is round, good gaging practice requires flat contacts to measure the ball diameter. This requires the anvils to be extremely parallel, and while a backstop may be employed to position the ball at the same location, anvil parallelism is still critical. To help ensure parallelism, a special lower anvil on the ball gage allows for parallelism adjustment with the sensitive upper contact.
A robust comparator is necessary for accurate measurements. This diagram demonstrates a common setup when measuring balls.
Using frictionless measuring probes should ensure constant gaging pressure, high performance, and low hysteresis, promoting a precise millionth measurement. Furthermore, to ensure repeatable positioning of the ball, users should install a V-notched saddle on the anvil to locate the ball. Finally, users should tilt the whole gage backward so gravity secures the ball between the notch and the reference anvil before the user brings the sensitive contact into place to measure it. Users will need to set up and use the gage in a controlled environment appropriate for microinch measurements, taking steps to guard against contamination and thermal influences.
There are two schools of thought on the measurement setup: One is to force the ball between the contacts to “wipe away” dust and oil that could skew the measurement. Another is to retract the upper contact with a lifting lever before placing the ball on the stage to ensure consistent gaging pressure between trials and reduce stress on the mechanism. While research on the effectiveness of each is inconclusive, the majority of users lean toward the retraction method, positioning the probe once the ball is in place. This reduces stress on the sensitive contact and provides repeatable probe contact to the ball being measured.
After preparing a precise setup, one may think measuring a ball is simple, but there is more to it than a single diameter.
When users specify a ball, they usually focus on its nominal diameter (D), meaning the value by which it is identified — think 0.5 inch or 12 mm. This diameter should lie within the range of its manufactured tolerance and correspond to the ball’s single diameter (Ds), which is the distance between two parallel planes tangent to the ball’s surface.
However, no ball is perfectly round or identical to another. When using balls as gage masters, it is important to establish the level of uncertainty. To accomplish this, individual balls are measured several times at random locations to find minimum and maximum diameters. The difference between these, known as ball diameter variation, is simply calculated as VDs = Ds max - Ds min.
Utilizing several additional parameters can help with quality control purposes. One parameter is ball mean diameter (Dm), the arithmetic mean of the largest and smallest single diameters of a ball, which is calculated as Dm = (Ds max + Ds min)/2. To account for production variation between units, manufacturers typically measure in lots. Lot sizes typically consist of 10 balls, but in some cases can be 50 or more. Calculations of lot mean diameter (DmL) and lot diameter variation (VDL) are based on the mean diameters of the largest and smallest balls in the lot, as follows:
DmL = (Dm max + Dm min)/2
VDL = Dm max - Dm min
All of the above are static measurements that users can perform using straightforward comparator gaging equipment. Bearing manufacturers, however, require more data to predict performance under dynamic conditions. These additional measurements can be performed using circular geometry (roundness) gages, which can generate least-squares circles, analyze waviness geometry in a velocity-proportional fashion, and perform harmonic analysis to predict the noise effects of part geometry at various speeds and under various loads. For machine shops that use balls mainly as measuring standards, precise comparator gages can provide all the data necessary to ensure accuracy.
The irregularity of a machined surface is the result of the machining process, including the choice of tool; feed and speed of the tool; machine geometry; and environmental conditions. This irregularity consists of high and low spots machined into a surface by the tool bit or a grinding wheel.
Measuring workpiece dimensions is relatively simple for machine operators but measuring workpiece geometry which involves more complex comparisons of part shape to an ideal shape--is now also practical on the shop floor. The gaging equipment for doing this is coming down in price while becoming easier to use.
A laser scanning system helps this shop capture the free-form surfaces on a hand-sculpted original. The resulting digitized models are the basis for CAM applications such as programming a CNC machining center.