8/9/2019 | 1 MINUTE READ

A Systematic Approach to Laser Sintering

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

As an early adopter of laser sintering technology, NyproMold uses a very focused, two-step strategy for evaluating when it makes sense to use it.

Share

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

NyproMold has had in-house laser sintering capabilities for more than 10 years. As an early adopter, we approached 3D printing with a consistent, two-step strategy. First, we asked how can 3D printing enable a better part and mold design, which could not be achieved through conventional machining? Second, we wanted to understand the benefit of the 3D-printed part design and objectively determine whether laser sintering is the most cost effective way to deliver this benefit.

Printing dozens of identical inserts in an unattended environment sounds like a simple manufacturing process, but realistically, laser-printed parts with their rough surface texture and wide (+/-0.002 inch) tolerances still require heat treat, subsequent CNC finishing operations and polishing to provide the dimensional accuracy, durability and finish required in our molds. This fact, combined with the high price of the material, means these parts can be costly to produce. Bottom line, 3D printing must provide a quantifiable benefit to plastic part quality, processing or part cost.

To support the decision to use the direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) process, we use a variety of simulation software. Mold cooling scenarios are developed in CAD, and the simulation tools enable us to predict the likely benefits of each unique design. It’s common for us to start with low cavitation development molds to confirm the actual results. The most common objective is reducing cycle time without any negative effects to part quality and consistency. The other leading targets for improvements are part distortion/warp reduction and improved part-to-part dimensional stability. Over time we have found the most cost effective and viable use of DMLS is its application in a hybrid process. Mold core/cavity inserts are partially machined with normal tool steels, and areas that have conformal cooling areas that cannot be machined are formed with the DMLS process. These hybrid components often offer the dual benefits of high durability over time, as well as the innovative conformal cooling that can deliver huge cost and quality benefits. Using DMLS is a consideration on every mold for us, and we have implemented it into production molds up to 96 cavities. While it is a unique and high-value technology, every tool has its place, and in the right cases, the benefits are sizable!

 

For More Information

 

Richard Stueber, Operations Manager

NyproMold Inc.

955 Tri-State Parkway
Gurnee, Illinois 60031

847-855-2252

rich.stueber@nypromold.com  

nypromold.com 

Hand holding a crystal ball

We’d rather send you $15 than rely on our crystal ball…

It’s Capital Spending Survey season and the manufacturing industry is counting on you to participate! Odds are that you received our 5-minute Metalworking survey from Modern Machine Shop in your mail or email. Fill it out and we’ll email you $15 to exchange for your choice of gift card or charitable donation. Are you in the U.S. and not sure you received the survey? Contact us to access it.

Help us inform the industry and everybody benefits.

RELATED CONTENT

Related Topics

Resources