Why QC Inspectors Should Consider Gaging Fixture Spring Rates
All fixtures for part gaging will have some amount of deflection or spring rate that can affect measurement accuracy. A better understanding of spring rate can enable quality control inspectors to detect and eliminate this possible error source.
The fixturing on which an indicating instrument is mounted often leads to gaging-error questions such as “what is spring rate?” and “how do you test for it?” Most fixtures are made of several component parts and are, in essence, a variation of the well-known C-frame. If the user is aware of the common problems that can affect the use of the C-frame and other fixture designs, it can be easy to detect and eliminate possible error sources.
All substances, regardless of their hardness, have some degree of elasticity. Small as it may be, elasticity is a real and vital condition to be considered in a precision gaging setup. One must accept that the frame arrangement inevitably will deflect from even the slightest pressure. This deflection becomes significant when it is great enough to affect calibration.
In fact, this deflection is also known as Hooke’s Law, as it was this physicist who determined that the amount a spring stretches varies with the amount of force applied. While there may be no springs in a micrometer or bench stand, in reality, the frame of the gage actually acts like a spring.
There are a few solutions: Increase the spring rate (stiffness) of the gage frame to the point in which deflection is no longer great enough to affect calibration, reduce the spring rate of the indicating system until the deflection becomes insignificant, or compensate for the deflection. Deflection can be compensated for with an acceptable degree of reliability, although virtual elimination is the preferable alternative.
The size of the part to be gaged also figures heavily into whether spring rate will be a large or small problem. Large frames designed to accommodate sizeable workpieces are much more susceptible to a spring deflection error than frames designed for small pieces.
In the example of a snap gage or bench stand, what is spring rate? Spring rate is the relationship of load, which is expressed in pounds, to the deflection it causes, which is expressed in inches. The less a gage frame will deflect under a given load the greater its spring rate.
Generally, the spring rate of the gage frame should be at least 100 times that of the indicating system. Here is a basic example:
- A 1-pound weight on frame’s arm at the center line of the indicator's spindle deflects the arm 0.004 inch, as noted by a change in indicator reading with the work in place (see illustration).
- The force applied to the spindle of the indicator itself will cause the same change in indicator reading, which should be no greater than 0.01 pound (about 1.5 grams).
How is this force measured? The force can be determined by placing a reasonably precise weight scale under the indicator and noting the change in scale reading as the indicator is moved to produce a 0.004-inch change in indicator reading. In simple terms, the spring-rate ratio between gage frame and indicating system may be calculated by dividing the spring rate of the gage frame by the spring rate of the indicating system. The answer, or ratio, should be 100 (or more):1 to ensure that deflection will be insignificant and not affect calibration.
For most hand tools and smaller bench fixtures, designs that have been in use for decades have demonstrated that unless there is some unusual set of circumstances, deflection is a very small potential source of error. In this case, trying to increase a level of tolerance out of the gage can push it to the limit in which spring rate would have an effect. However, with special applications, such as large parts and long posts/arms on fixtures, it may be wise to take a look at spring rate and deflection as a source of error.
InspectionXpert software from Extensible CAD Technologies has standardized and automated this manufacturer’s process for ballooning drawings and generating inspection reports.
Lockheed Martin’s precision machining of composite skin sections for the F-35 provides part of the reason why this plane saves money for U.S. taxpayers. That machining makes the plane compelling in ways that have led other countries to take up some of the cost. Here is a look at a high-value, highly engineered machining process for the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft.
Few manufacturing companies rely on ballbar testing to maintain machine tool accuracy as thoroughly as Silfex. Now, advanced training and a move to a Renishaw QC20-W wireless system have enabled the company to take the benefits of ballbar testing to a higher level.