In Hogout Machining, the CAD File Becomes Critical

To serve customers by helping them bypass casting, this shop first needs a close-enough relationship with the customer that it can count on getting good CAD data. Here is why.


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

The January issue of Modern Machine Shop describes R&D Manco’s ongoing shift from machining castings to greater machining of hogouts. One significant detail the article did not have the chance to address is the growing significance this shift brings to having complete and precise CAD data from the customer. In short, before R&D Manco could help its customers by streamlining its manufacturing, it first had to have conversations with customers about obtaining these reliable digital models.

Five-axis machining is part of the reason. Machining castings need not be as complex as machining from solid. The machining of castings is liable to include milling mating surfaces and drilling and tapping holes. This machining might be multi-face or multi-setup, but not five-axis. By contrast, programming the five-axis contour-machining cycle for a part with the organic, complex form of a casting obviously requires an accurate part model from the customer. In hogout machining, the digital model rather than the physical casting is the shop’s starting point.

The digital model is also the end point because it is this model that defines what the customer expects and what the shop will deliver. Indeed, having a good CAD model offers the chance to not only streamline machining (applying tactics such as trochoidal machining, for example, where the stock allowance around the parts permits), but also streamline inspection. R&D Manco recently began experimenting with “Productivity+” software from Renishaw, software for comparing probing measurements of a machined part at the machine tool with the original CAD model for that part. So far, the shop has developed enough confidence in this software to trust it for first-article inspection, an advance that saves considerable time. The part no longer has to be removed from the machine tool while the machine and the machinist wait for first-article inspection as an independent step, but instead, this validation of the machining process now can be quickly performed entirely at—and by—the machine tool.

But another vital opportunity the CAD model provides in hogout machining is the chance to save the customer money by proposing geometric changes. A part that was formerly a casting frequently has features only a casting requires. Examples include radiused features that are natural to casting but would demand a significant amount of cycle time for contour milling if they had to be reproduced in machining. Frequently, a part converted from casting to hogout is so well established that no one involved has any memory that certain features were designed for casting’s sake alone. Part of the job of CAM programmers at R&D Manco, therefore, is to spot and question potentially unnecessary features such as this.

Indeed, with the advance into greater machining of hogouts, the role of the CAM programmer at this shop and demand on programming capacity have significantly expanded. In the past, this shop had two engineers proficient at CAM programming, and that was plenty. Today, two other engineers who have previously been involved with process planning are also being trained in CAM programming, so the number of programmers will soon be four.

Related Topics


  • Standardizing The Measurement Process To Find The Right Gage

    Guidelines used to standardize the measuring process can provide a good basis for making gage decisions.

  • How Accurate Is Your Machining Center?

    Virtually every machine tool builder lists, as part of a machine's specification, accuracy and repeatability figures. What's generally not given is the method used to arrive at the figures. Though these methods are defined in linear positioning standards, not all builders use the same standards.

  • Composites Machining for the F-35

    Lockheed Martin’s precision machining of composite skin sections for the F-35 provides part of the reason why this plane saves money for U.S. taxpayers. That machining makes the plane compelling in ways that have led other countries to take up some of the cost. Here is a look at a high-value, highly engineered machining process for the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft.