The Part Is Longer Than The Lathe
Here is one custom machine builder’s system for producing a 40-foot part that has to be passed through the turning center and out the other side. INCLUDES VIDEO.
The bar feed is usually thought of as a device for machining many parts from a length of stock. The lathe cuts the bar into pieces (specifically, into workpieces) as the bar feed incrementally advances the stock into one machining cycle after another.
But imagine the bar feed instead as a device for allowing the lathe to handle a single very long part—a part many times longer than the lathe itself. The bar feed passes the part through the lathe and out the other side, so the lathe can machine it as it goes. An arrangement like this would require a bar unloader that is just as long as the bar feed to receive the part on the other side.
J.F. Berns recently engineered such a system. The company is a specialty machine builder and bar feed accessory supplier in Cincinnati, Ohio. The bar feed and bar-unloading system it engineered around a customer’s turning center
accommodates parts measuring 7/8 to 2-1/2 inch in diameter and as long as 40 feet.
The long parts are heavy tubes made of steel. They serve as links in a system that carries electronics cabling deep into oil wells. Each of these machined links requires turning work at each end and cross-hole drilling all along the length. Thanks to the custom system, a 40-foot workpiece can be machined on an Okuma Macturn 350W turning center that has a maximum distance of 76 inches between the main spindle and subspindle. In other words, no more than about 15 percent of the part is in the machine tool at any one time. According to J.F. Berns president Joe Berns, “Supporting the work at this length is one thing, but feeding and supporting it is something else.”
Push And Pull
The system feeds the long work in three stages:
1. Within the bar feed, the first of two servo-driven pushers advances the work through the machine tool’s main spindle and into the workzone. The pusher stops when the end of the part reaches through the main spindle and into the machine just far enough for the opposing subspindle to grab it.
2. The subspindle feeds close to the main spindle to clamp the end of the part. The subspindle then feeds away to pull the part farther into the workzone, and machining is performed on the length that is pulled inside the machine. The subspindle then releases the part, advances toward the main spindle to clamp the bar down farther still, and feeds out to pull the next section into the machine. Machined section is pushed out into the unloader by the subspindle’s motion. Machining keeps proceeding in this way—the subspindle performing clamp, pull, release, clamp, pull, release—until the end of the part is reached.
3. At the end of the part, no stock is left for the main spindle to grip. The subspindle therefore can’t draw the part the rest of the way through by itself. So a second pusher cycles into position within the bar feed. This pusher has a rod attached, with a head sized to the diameter of the bar. The rod is long enough to reach all the way through the workzone and through both spindles, pushing the work the rest of the way through the subspindle and entirely into the unloader.
Short Parts, Too
If it weren’t for the length of the second pusher, then one pusher would be sufficient, says Gary Wildt. Mr. Wildt is J.F. Berns’s engineering manager. The system could work with only one pusher, but then the need for the long rod in stage 3 would increase the length (and floorspace) of the overall bar feed system. The two-pusher approach allows the long pusher to be kept to one side of the work and used only when most of the part has already passed into the lathe.
The pusher with the long rod also enables this system to accommodate short workpieces, he says. That was another requirement of the system: It had to accommodate not just the 40-foot bars, but a range of bar sizes down to a length of just 3 feet.
Mr. Berns did the control and programming work. He says the Okuma machine’s THINC control made the overall system considerably more versatile and error-proof than it otherwise might have been. The bar feed and a high-pressure coolant system from Chipblaser both interface with the control. Another CNC might have offered more restrictive data connections, he says, which would have forced him to minimize how much information he allowed the machine and bar feed to share. But the openness of the THINC system allowed him to capture liberal amounts of data, including status and position feedback throughout the cycle.
As a result, redundant systems confirm that (for example) the entry of the bar unloader has safely extended to its proper position relative to the current position of the subspindle.
The amount of position feedback also lets him enable the bar feed and the lathe together to resume machining from any interim point in the cycle. This saves time, he says—allowing the operator to recover from a tool break or similar fault without having to re-run the entire part from the beginning.
UNCC researchers introduce modulation into the tool path. Chip breaking was the goal, but higher metal removal rate is an intriguing secondary effect.
Robotic automation is transforming a job that was perhaps a machine operator’s least-favorite work assignment into one that is not a heavy lift.
The right choices in tooling and technique can optimize the thread turning process.