COMPREHENSIVE OFFERING OF SOLID CARBIDE ENDMILLS
Published

Single System Offers Multiple Finishing Processes For Small Parts

An electrochemical finishing technology geared toward small workpieces cleans, deburrs, passivates, polishes and stress relieves workpieces all at once.

Share

Accurate machining is only one piece of the manufacturing puzzle. Machined components, especially those used for medical, scientific, semi-conductor and automotive applications, often require secondary finishing processes for polishing or burr removal before assembly or use. These secondary operations can be challenging for very small parts or parts with delicate features. Mechanical finishing processes have the potential to be damaging, while conventional electropolishing (EP) may not have the capability to remove large burrs. This is often why many shops will outsource this post-machining work.

Extrude Hone (Irwin, Pennsylvania), has developed a new electrochemical finishing technology that can perform five finishing processes in one operation. Geared toward small-parts finishing, the company’s CoolPulse system simultaneously cleans, deburrs, passivates, polishes and stress relieves workpieces. The non-contact system will not damage tiny features, such as thin walls. It offers advantages over traditional EP in that it uses a cool, non-fuming electrolyte solution that is easy to handle. Plus, the system’s relatively small learning curve may lead shops to consider bringing finishing work in-house, where they can have better control over delivery time, part handling and costs.

Like conventional EP, the CoolPulse process immerses workpieces in an electrolyte bath and applies a low-voltage DC charge. However, the CoolPulse process differs from EP in various ways, according to Jim Koroskenyi, managing director of Extrude Hone’s electrochemical business unit. It uses a chilled, high-resistance electrolyte solution with a near-neutral pH level. Because the solution is odorless and non-fuming, it does not require a dedicated ventilation system and is safe to handle. Its high electrical resistance makes it effective for removing burrs and peaks on workpiece surfaces. A filtration system allows the solution to retain its effectiveness over extended periods of operating time, eliminating costs for additional solution or for waste disposal.

The solution is compatible with a variety of materials, including steels, aluminum and magnesium, as well as chrome and cobalt alloys and copper-based alloys. The system accommodates different material types and workpiece sizes through adjustment of parameters such as voltage, pulse, time and temperature. Typical finishing cycle time ranges from 15 seconds for very small parts to 3 minutes for workpieces with large burrs and heavy polishing requirements. Those cycle times are the same for one or multiple parts. This is twice the speed of conventional EP, according to Mr. Koroskenyi.

While CoolPulse is optimized for burr removal, substantial surface and cleanliness improvements are natural by-products of the process. The system produces a mirror-like finish on stainless steel and bright to matte finishes on aluminum.

Mr. Koroskenyi says conventional EP can take considerable training and experience to maintain process control, which is often why shops outsource this these secondary operations. However, this works against the goal of single-part manufacturing, cellular production and minimizing part movement. The CoolPulse system is designed for installation on the shop floor, and the skill set needed to operate the system is said to be comparable to that required to operate a CNC machining center or EDM unit.

So what kind of learning curve would shops having no experience with such finishing equipment face with this system? Mr. Koroskenyi says that shops should first spend two days of theory training and three days of practical demonstration and tooling and process training. After two to three weeks, shops should be able to master the technology for one class of parts. Two to three months later, shops are likely to possess sufficient understanding to finish virtually any type of part.

Z-Carb HPR | Series Z5
IMCO
Try TRIM® Cutting and Grinding Fluid FREE!
T.J. Davies
Walter USA
Ingersoll Cutting Tools
Iscar
Horn USA
Sumitomo
The view from my shop.
MMS Top Shops
Starrett 2900 Series Digital Indicator

Related Content

IMTS

Automated and Manual Deburring With One Tool

IMTS22: J.W. Done Corp. showcases its Orbitool, one tool capable of automated and manual deburring. The tool is capable of working on several differently sized holes.

Read More
Deburring

Ingersoll Rand Offers Two New Belt Sanders for Smooth Finishes

Ingersoll Rand’s 360-313 and 360-418 Pneumatic Belt Sanders work effectively on metal, plastic, fiberglass, wood and other materials.

Read More
Deburring

Trumpf Deburring Tool Provides Repeatable Accuracy

The TruTool TKA 1500 edge milling tool is now available with a new cutting mount and guide fence for increased applications and safety.

Read More
SPONSORED

How to Accelerate Robotic Deburring & Automated Material Removal

Pairing automation with air-driven motors that push cutting tool speeds up to 65,000 RPM with no duty cycle can dramatically improve throughput and improve finishing.

Read More

Read Next

Shop Management Software

ERP and Process Changes Increase Shop’s Revenue 64% YoY

Implementing ProShop has led to a massive process overhaul at Marzilli Machine. From 2020 to 2021, revenue increased 64% without capital investment.

Read More

3 Mistakes That Cause CNC Programs to Fail

Despite enhancements to manufacturing technology, there are still issues today that can cause programs to fail. These failures can cause lost time, scrapped parts, damaged machines and even injured operators.

Read More
IMCO