How To Machine Aircraft Titanium: Plunge And Sweep For Finishing The Corners

Part of a series of articles on more efficient machining of pockets in titanium parts, this article describes an effective approach to finishing internal corners.

Article From: 2/2/2009 Modern Machine Shop, ,

Editor's Commentary

Links to other articles in this series can be found under “Editor Picks” at right.

Click Image to Enlarge

Danger of increased radial depth of cut in corners

This drawing illustrates the reason to remove material from corners prior to finishing pocket walls. If material is not removed from corners, radial depth of cut increases dramatically as the tool enters the corner. In addition to the effect on tool life, the surface finish of the part is likely to suffer.

land for plunging

In the plunge-and-sweep technique, a land on the cutting edge is useful for plunging, but should not be used for sweeping. Thus, the technique could be done with land and no-land versions of this same tool (see next photo)....

Though the “slicing” technique described in the article “Getting The Metal Out” (see Editor Picks at right) can be effective for roughing material from a corner in titanium, the considerations that go into finishing an internal corner go well beyond efficiency. Surface finish and part accuracy during the finishing pass also have to be considered—and both of these concerns are likely to be unmet if the same tool that finishes the walls of the pocket proceeds directly into the corners. When finish milling titanium, the corners have to be treated as an entirely separate operation, often performed before the finishing of the walls.

A drawing at right shows why. A milling tool running at a light radial depth of cut takes on a much heavier engagement as soon as it enters the corner. The tool is likely to both chatter and deflect in this area—assuming it even survives the increase in load.

One way to finish the corners separately and safely would be to slowly side mill just this material. Another approach would be to plunge mill the corner material. Both techniques might involve large length-to-diameter multiples because the tool can be no bigger than the specified radius of the internal corner. After evaluating both techniques at length-to-diameter multiples ranging up to 5.5, the Boeing Research and Technology group (BR&T) in St. Louis ultimately arrived at a corner machining process that combines plunging and side milling together.

Plunging corners is inherently more stable. Experiments showed this. Compared to side milling, plunge milling reduces tool deflection and considerably improves surface finish, while cycle time results showed the best improvement of all. However, plunging alone is insufficient. To clear enough material from the corners to leave ample clearance for the wall-finishing tools, Boeing recommends a technique called plunge-and-sweep. After plunging the corner, side milling can sweep out more of the material adjacent to the plunged area.

The same tool can be used for plunging and sweeping if the length-to-diameter ratio is no greater than 4. Above 4, Boeing says, only similar tools can be used. The plunging tool tends to chatter as it descends deep into the pocket. To overcome this, BR&T engineers use a tool with a stabilizing land of about 0.004 inch on each cutting edge. The land rubs against the part material, essentially stabilizing the cut by acting like a bearing surface. Because the same effect is counter-productive in side milling, a separate tool is needed for the sweep.

These separate plunge and sweep tools could actually be the same except for the land. The only disadvantage would be the chance for confusing the two tools because the land is not easy to see. The shop performing plunge-and-sweep might therefore prefer different numbers of flutes for the different operations—just for the value of being able to easily tell the two tools apart.

A final advantage of plunge-and-sweep is that it opens up the possibility for the sweep to be quite large—making room for a tool much larger than the internal corner to perform the finishing of the walls. Perhaps best illustrated by the 45-flute tool in the article about the 8-to-1 rule at right, a larger tool permits more flutes, which allows finishing to be performed at a higher feed rate. In this way, getting the corner material out of the way before wall finishing ultimately makes the overall finishing operation much more productive.

Click one of the links under Editor Picks at right to see another article in this series.

Comments are reviewed by moderators before they appear to ensure they meet Modern Machine Shop’s submission guidelines.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Learn More

Editor's Picks

How To Machine Aircraft Titanium: Getting The Metal Out

Part of a series of articles on machining pockets in titanium parts, this article describes vario...

Plunge-And-Sweep For Finishing Corners

Machining animation from Boeing illustrates effective techniques for titanium workpieces.

How To Machine Aircraft Titanium: The 8-To-1 Rule For Finishing Walls And Ribs

Part of a series of articles on more efficient machining of pockets in titanium parts, this artic...

How To Machine Aircraft Titanium: Pricing The Process Instead Of The Tool

Part of a series of articles on more efficient machining of pockets in titanium parts, this artic...

How To Machine Aircraft Titanium (Introduction To A Series)

Choose cutters, depths and tool paths with attention to particular steps in the process, and you ...

ERIX tool saves up to 90% of the manufacturing time on back spotfacing and chamfering operations.
AMAMCO Tool exceeds ISO and AS 9100 standards for quality, precision, and consistency.
Click here>
Channel Partners
  • Techspex