“[I]f you think of dropping a leaf in a stream, sometimes it's going to rocket down that stream if it's in the right path, and it's going to go really fast. Other times, it may get swallowed up in the vortex over on the side somewhere,” says Ashley Eckhoff, additive manufacturing program team member at Siemens Digital Industries Software.
When it comes to fluid flow, a designer’s instinct might be to create plenty of space, to lay out a wide “stream” for the hypothetical “leaf” to travel through. But a wide-open space isn’t necessarily conducive to efficient fluid flow, Eckhoff says. Too much space creates more opportunities for those vortexes to form, causing the fluid to double back on itself and waste energy.
But until the advent of simulation software, designers had no real way of seeing this. Many of the “streams” in the physical world are actually too large, too inefficient and require more power to operate than necessary as a result. For an example, look no further than the so-called “Mighty Duct.”
Nicknamed the “Mighty Duct,” the component to the right is a new version of an air duct for the Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) 3D printing platform that was redesigned using computational fluid dynamics. Both this duct and its previous version (left) are 3D printed using MJF. Images: Siemens
This air duct is a component for HP’s Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) polymer 3D printer. The nylon part is a piece of the ductwork that delivers air to the printhead, keeping it cool during operation. Until recently, this air duct had a fairly conventional shape derived from an earlier design intended for injection molding.
But when HP teamed up with Siemens, collaborators saw this air duct as a design opportunity. Simulating the airflow through Siemens’ Star CCM+ computational fluid dynamics software revealed that the air wasn’t utilizing all the space allotted in the original design; rather, it followed four distinct pathways through the duct’s main turn.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software from Siemens revealed that the air wasn’t utilizing all the space inside the original duct design. A new, 3D printable version eliminates the unused space and funnels air through the four most efficient pathways instead.
Eckhoff and his team used the CFD data as the basis for a new design, one that eliminates wasted space and instead directs the volume of air through the pathways it naturally wants to follow. The resulting air duct is unlike any previous, human-driven design and would be impossible to manufacture without 3D printing. Its complexity delivers significant performance advantages — HP reports that the new design delivers a 22% improvement in efficiency. While the rest of the cooling system remains the same for now, efficiency gains like those delivered by the Mighty Duct could lead to other improvements in the future, like a smaller fan and reduced energy needed to move air through the system.
Air flow efficiency wasn’t the only win from this project, however. Peter Zelinski and I sat down with Eckhoff and Luis Baldez, head of strategic initiatives at HP, in a recent episode of The Cool Parts Show to learn how the Mighty Duct also showcases assembly consolidation, rapid design iteration, reduced manufacturing lead times and more. The episode was originally broadcast live through the IMTS spark platform; view an edited version here:
A new metal AM system for batches of end-use parts was designed to permit productivity and machine pricing comparable to a CNC machine tool.
A video from Pratt & Whitney illustrates the steps needed to additively manufacture an aerospace component.
A hybrid system combining metal 3D printing with machining gives the Marine Corps perhaps its most effective resource yet for obtaining needed hardware in the field. It also offers an extreme version of the experience a machine shop might have in adding metal AM to its capabilities.