Creep-feed Grinding Is A Milling Process
Because creep-feed grinding is essentially a milling process, why not use a VMC? A grinding machine supplier describes how a VMC platform can make creep-feed grinding more effective.
Creep-feed grinding is an abrasive machining process, but beyond that, it doesn’t resemble other forms of grinding. Nelson Beaulieu, grinding product manager with Hardinge Inc., says it makes more sense to characterize creep-feed grinding as a milling process.
After all, creep-feed grinding employs a deep cut and a high metal removal rate, and it features a low feed rate in place of fast reciprocating motion. The “tool” in creep-feed grinding—the grinding wheel—gets buried in the material like a milling cutter.
In fact, that tool gets more effective as its diameter shrinks down closer to the dimensions of the largest milling cutter on a typical machining center. And if the machine itself is designed like a vertical machining center, he says, then a tool such as this becomes more practical.
Mr. Beaulieu says these points summarize the thinking behind his company’s VMC-based grinder. The FGC 2 “flexible grinding center” from Bridgeport (a Hardinge company) represents a departure from traditional creep-feed grinder designs—and the orientation of the spindle is perhaps the most fundamental difference.
Up Out Of The Way
When creep-feed grinding was first developed, Mr. Beaulieu says, practically all grinding machines had horizontal spindles. Creep-feed grinding naturally built on this platform. However, one of the basic requirements of this horizontal design is a big wheel. The wheel diameter has to be large enough for the edge of the wheel to clear the spindle housing and reach the table.
This requirement imposes limitations, he says. Coolant penetration is essential to effective creep-feed grinding, but the wide arc of the big wheel results in a tighter space for this coolant to try to reach. In addition, the big wheel makes it impractical to interpolate along complex machining paths. Instead, parts are often held on complex fixtures, and the part may be moved from fixture to fixture on one creep-feed machine after another as different features of the part are ground.
By contrast, lifting the spindle housing out of the way of the work zone makes it easy to apply a smaller wheel. Coolant can thus be delivered to the cut more effectively, and the part can be fed through rotary axes to let the small-diameter wheel use tool paths like those of a five-axis machining center.
The FGC machine essentially is a five-axis machining center. However, because the work is grinding instead of milling (milling in the conventional sense, that is), the machine had to deliver the sort of stiffness that is a key strength of the traditional horizontal platform. Unlike a typical VMC, the rigid cast iron base of this machine weighs 30,100 pounds. Also unlike a VMC, the machine is used in conjunction with a special coolant system able to deliver the 1,000 psi or 50 gallons per minute that creep-feed grinding requires.
These changes mean the vertical machine is not necessarily less expensive initially. Mr. Beaulieu says the savings come once the machine is applied. Sources of savings include:
- Fewer fixtures or fewer machines. Instead of multiple setups, it may be that all of the grinding can be performed in one setup.
- Reduced setup time, because the need for complex fixturing can be eliminated.
- Fewer machining operations, because the ability to reorient the part within the cycle can make it possible to machine separate features with the same wheel.
- Faster machining (over and above the setup time savings), because the smaller wheel can be moved more nimbly. Mr. Beaulieu says the user can take a lighter depth of cut on this machine and still achieve a higher metal removal rate because the potential feed rate is that much higher.
Further savings come when the machine is used exactly as a conventional VMC. Its spindle uses a machining center’s standard BT interface for the tooling, and grinding wheels are delivered to the spindle via a standard machining center toolchanger. The same system can therefore be used to apply more typical machining center tooling within the same cycle. That is, mills or drills can wait in the tool magazine alongside the wheels. If some milled or drilled feature needs to locate with respect to a ground surface, then it makes sense to let the machine produce those additional features while the part is still set up.
One other way the VMC platform makes creep-feed grinding easier to apply relates to resources outside the work zone. With the machine so similar to a standard machining center, it becomes possible for machining center personnel to program and run the creep-feed process effectively. The pool of available talent therefore increases. As Mr. Beaulieu points out, “There are a lot more milling operators out there than there are grinding operators.”
In vertical grinding, the workpiece is held upright in a rotary chuck with the grinding spindle overhead. This configuration can improve roundness, facilitate single-setup processing and prolong the life of the machine. Loading and unloading may gets easier, too. Workpieces with relatively large diameters and short lengths benefit the most from vertical grinding.
Roughing and finishing on a single machine, using a single setup, has appeal for most shops. The advantages in time savings and accuracy are obvious. Eliminating the transport of workpieces between machines, as well as the setup for those secondary operations, is a boon for throughput. Critical features that need to maintain dimensional relationships can be much more reliably produced if machined complete in one clamping.
Real-time-responding CNC brings new possibilities to difficult machining applications.