Lower Buy-to-Fly Ratios with Near-Net Additive Manufacturing
Building up large parts with wire-arc metal 3D printing rather than machining from solid has allowed this aerospace manufacturer to reduce its buy-to-fly ratio dramatically.
.jpg;width=70;height=70;mode=crop)
Share
.JPG;maxWidth=720)
Machining a large aerospace part like this from solid can result in up to 90% of the material being scrapped as chips. Building it up with metal 3D printing greatly reduces the machining time and amount of material needed.
“We buy raw material to make it fly; the less material remains on the ground the better,” says Heinz Baehr, a member of the executive board for Aircraft Philipp Group in Übersee, Germany.
Featured Content
This dichotomy between material purchased and material that ultimately ends up in flight can be expressed by a buy-to-fly ratio, in other words the ratio of material input to final part output. A high ratio means that much of the raw material that was purchased never made it to the air. Most of that material became scrap on the ground, likely cut away in a machining process. When dealing with expensive metals like titanium, those unused chips can add up to significant cost. A conventional process like milling can have a buy-to-fly ratio 10 or higher.
To reduce scrap and improve its buy-to-fly ratio, Aircraft Philipp has implemented metal additive manufacturing (AM) to manufacture near-net-shape parts. Using a wire-arc-based AM system from Gefertec to print large parts has reduced machining time as well as material usage. As a result, the company’s buy-to-fly ratio is now close to 2 on large aerospace components.
Read more in this report from Barbara Schulz, European correspondent for Modern Machine Shop and sister publication Additive Manufacturing.
Additive Manufacturing Conference
Want to learn more about AM for part production? Attend the Additive Manufacturing Conference + Expo, a three-day technical conference, exhibit hall and business networking event focused on the industrial applications of additive technologies for production. Register here.
Related Topics
RELATED CONTENT
-
Do's and Don'ts of Finishing Metal 3D-Printed Parts
Finishing 3D-printed parts requires different considerations than conventionally machined ones. One expert offers tips.
-
The Case for 3D-Printed Workholding: Collapsing Costs and Lead Times
When Precision Metal Products purchased its first 3D printer last year, the company hoped to collapse both tooling costs and lead times. But the technology’s impact is reaching core business operations, enabling the shop to focus on higher-margin, lower-volume production.
-
Three Examples of Additive Manufacturing in Production
Is additive manufacturing (AM) ready for production scale? The latest issue of Additive Manufacturing magazine highlights manufacturers who are succeeding with 3D printing for production right now.
