Buying a Coordinate Measuring Machine: Sorting through Standards and Probes
What’s the difference between the ASME B89.4.1 and ISO 10360 calibration standards for CMMs?
In the last post on the topic, we discussed coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) in context: how far they have come technologically, and where they are headed. Now, let’s take a look at a couple factors that make these systems so complex as well as capable: calibration standards and probe uses.
The Difference between ASME B89.4.1 and ISO 10360
Producing measurement data about a part to verify its accuracy and validate the integrity of its manufacturing process is a prime function of the CMM. However, to meet this function as well as to satisfy traceability requirements, CMMs must be properly calibrated periodically at a frequency set by the user. The two most common standards by which most CMMs are calibrated are ASME B89.4.1 and ISO 10360-2. The two standards are very similar.
The ASME B89 standard involves a ballbar artifact. Its use is generally confined to North America, whereas the ISO 10360 is favored in Europe, where it originated. This ISO standard is based on the measurement of certified length standards.
The B89 standard uses a ballbar of an uncalibrated length and is essentially a length measured repeatedly throughout the full working volume of the CMM. The axis scales are first calibrated by a separate test (linear displacement accuracy) using a calibrated artifact such as a step gage or laser interferometer. Once the axis scales have been adjusted to measure properly, the ballbar is then used to ensure that the measurement of this length parallel to any axis will repeat anywhere within the volume of the CMM. This ballbar test yields the maximum range of results from all measurements.
The ISO 10360 standard applies to articulated-arm CMMs using tactile probes and optionally optical distance sensors (also referred to as laser line scanners or laser line probes). It specifies the acceptance tests for verifying the performance of an articulated-arm CMM based on a calibrated test length as stated by the CMM manufacturer. It also specifies the tests that enable the user to periodically re-verify the performance of the CMM. Details on tests for scanner accessories are also given. Part of ISO 10360 specifies performance requirements that can be assigned by the manufacturer or the user of the articulated-arm CMM. It also specifies the manner of execution for the acceptance and reverification tests to demonstrate the stated requirements.
Which Probe and When?
When inspecting parts with simple holes for which location and diameter are most important, a touch-trigger probe will be most appropriate for the job. Parts requiring form, best fit or true position calculations will require a scanning probe to capture adequate data for analysis. 3D scanning for modeling, reverse engineering or comparing to the CAD file are functions easily done on a CMM. Deciding which sensor to use is often determined by the required part accuracy and speed. If you’re manufacturing aerospace turbine blades, for example, five-axis scanners or 3D non-contact laser scanners will perform the work far more quickly and with less programming than touch-trigger probes. Fixed-head camera sensors, which are new to the market, are supposedly capable of scanning leading and trailing edges of turbine blades very quickly. When the profile of a surface or surface flatness is important, non-contact white-light and blue-light sensors or cameras can be used. There are also probes available to measure surface finish on a CMM.
CMMs add great value. In fact, producing data about a part to verify its accuracy, validate manufacturing processes, satisfy traceability requirements and serve other product lifecycle interests adds value as much as cutting chips does, so CMMs are, in fact, moneymakers—a good reason to select a new CMM with great care and forethought.
This is part two of a three-part series about buying a CMM.
- Part one: CMMs Past and Future
Find more insights about acquiring a new machine tool by visiting the Techspex Knowledge Center, “Guide to Buying Machine Tools.”
The irregularity of a machined surface is the result of the machining process, including the choice of tool; feed and speed of the tool; machine geometry; and environmental conditions. This irregularity consists of high and low spots machined into a surface by the tool bit or a grinding wheel.
Functional gear testing, also known as total radial composite deviation, is a method of looking at the total effect of gear errors. This test method simulates the conditions under which a set of gears is likely to operate as a result of the gears meshing together.
Lockheed Martin’s precision machining of composite skin sections for the F-35 provides part of the reason why this plane saves money for U.S. taxpayers. That machining makes the plane compelling in ways that have led other countries to take up some of the cost. Here is a look at a high-value, highly engineered machining process for the Joint Strike Fighter aircraft.