Closing the Loop for Better Gaging

Most dimensional gages have some type of reference, which is the part of the gage that provides a hard stop and is the starting point from which the dimensional measurement is taken. For example, on a snap gage or bench stand, the reference is usually called a fixed or reference anvil since it tends to be flat. The reference point is where the measurement is started, and every contact gaging system has one.

Speed and increased performance requirements might necessitate the use of a comparative gage. In this case, another reference may be added. This helps eliminate both operator and gage variability errors, improving gage repeatability.

Featured Content

Addressing Manufacturing Challenges with Automation READ MORE

When Will We See Humanoid Robots on the Manufacturing Floor? READ MORE

10 Robotic Solutions You Can Find at IMTS 2026 READ MORE

Directly opposite, and in line with the reference anvil, is the measuring instrument’s sensitive contact. This is the mechanism that does the actual comparative or direct sensing of the contact’s position. Take the case of a bench stand with a dial indicator: The contact — usually having a radius — is the actual tip of the indicator. For a micrometer, it's the sensitive anvil, and with a dial caliper, it's the sensitive jaw. But the message is that this sensing contact is the point that is really “feeling” the measurement.

In the fixed-reference anvil, the sensitive contact and backstop just can't live by themselves. They must be held together by the gage itself, and this is where our measuring loop comes into play. With a snap gage, it is the frame, reference(s) and indication device. A bench stand may have the base, post, an arm and indicating device

In these examples, the whole structure makes up the measuring loop. To get the best performance out of the measuring loop, keep it as small as possible along with being rigid and robust. For example, to make a length check on a part smaller than 10 mm, choose the smallest and most robust bench stand that has the capacity for this part. The larger a bench stand gets, the more “spring” or deflection might be seen in the posts and arms of the gage. Choosing a larger gage, say 10 times the capacity, would increase the measuring loop and potentially increase the chances of variation in part measurement due to flexing in the measuring loop.

As mentioned in the beginning, this not only applies to mechanical gaging but also surface and form measurement.

In the case of a skidded surface measurement, the sensitive contact now becomes the surface finish probe and its drive. The reference is the skidded probe and the measuring loop is created by the fixturing holding everything together. In most cases, the drive unit/probe can be directly placed on the part for the shortest measuring loop possible. However, sometimes certain applications call for measuring surfaces in deep bores. One solution for doing this would be to keep the drive outside the bore and use probe extensions to position the probe deep into the bore. But this, in effect, makes the measuring loop larger, opening the door for vibration and fixturing issues that can negatively influence the results. When possible, it would be best to position the drive and probe into the bore with special fixturing to close the loop and improve the results.

Finally, there are some form systems that have small part measuring capacities and others in which small- and large-volume parts can be measured. Certainly, the large systems have much more robust columns and arms employed. This is designed into the gage to account for both small and large measuring loops. For the best performance (since one can’t shrink the loop) the components in the loop must be made robust enough to produce the same performance for both small and large parts.

After reading this, the next time you look at your measuring and gaging instruments, you will have new insight into finding the measuring loop.